Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 92-98 (October 2008)


View previous. 14 of 20 View next.

Interruptions of once-daily thoracic radiotherapy do not correlate with outcomes in limited stage small cell lung cancer: Analysis of CALGB phase III trial 9235

Jeffrey A. Bogarta1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Dorothy Watsonb1, Edward F. McClayc1, Lisa Evansd1, James E. Herndonb1, Frances Lauriee1, Stephen L. Seagrenc1, T.J. Fitzgeralde1, Everett Vokesf1, Mark R. Greend1

Received 19 October 2007; received in revised form 20 January 2008; accepted 9 February 2008. published online 26 March 2008.

Summary 

Purpose

Retrospective data suggests prolonging the time to complete thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) may negatively impact tumor control and survival in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). We examined the association between TRT duration and outcomes on a prospective phase III study.

Material and methods

This review included 267 patients who received protocol TRT on a phase III CALGB LSCLC study assessing the addition of tamoxifen to standard chemo-radiotherapy. TRT, to a planned dose of 50Gy in 2Gy daily fractions, was initiated with the fourth chemotherapy cycle. TRT interruptions were mandated for hematologic toxicity (granulocytes<1000/mm3 or platelets<75,000/mm3) and esophageal toxicity (dysphagia necessitating intravenous hydration).

Results

TRT interruptions ≥3 days occurred in 115 patients (43%), most frequently during the 4th week of TRT, and did not differ between treatment arms. Hematologic toxicity and esophageal toxicity were the most frequent indications for interrupting TRT. Variables including advanced age (>70 years), gender, race, or radiotherapy treatment volume did not predict for TRT interruptions. Overall survival (OS) and local tumor control did not correlate with the administration of TRT interruptions or with TRT duration.

Conclusion

Toxicity mandated interruptions of conventional dose, once-daily, TRT may not adversely affect outcomes for patients receiving TRT concurrent with chemotherapy (cycle 4) for LSCLC. The implications for accelerated or high dose TRT regimens are not clear.

a SUNY Upstate Medical University, Radiation Oncology Department, 750 E. Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States2

b CALGB Statistical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States3

c University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States4

d Southeast Cancer Control Consortium Inc., CCOP, Goldsboro, NC, United States5

e Quality Assurance Review Center, Independent Laboratories, Providence, RI, United States

f University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States6

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 315 464 5276; fax: +1 315 464 5939.

1 For Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Chicago, IL) and Quality Assurance Review Center (Providence, RI).

2 Supported by CA45389.

3 Supported by CA33601.

4 Supported by CA11789.

5 Supported by CA45808.

6 Supported by CA41287.

PII: S0169-5002(08)00066-4

doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.02.006


View previous. 14 of 20 View next.