Lung Cancer
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 3-18, January 2000

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Lijie Zhong

      Affiliations

    • Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Qe, Canada
    • Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, PR China
  • ,
  • Mark S Goldberg

      Affiliations

    • Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Qe, Canada
    • Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Research Center on Human Health, INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, University of Quebec, 531, Boulevard des Prairies, Laval, QC, Canada H7V 1B7
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel: +1-450-687-5010 ext. 4338; fax: +1-450-686-5599
  • ,
  • Marie-Élise Parent

      Affiliations

    • Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Research Center on Human Health, INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, University of Quebec, 531, Boulevard des Prairies, Laval, QC, Canada H7V 1B7
  • ,
  • James A Hanley

      Affiliations

    • Joint Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Qe, Canada

Received 28 June 1999; accepted 1 September 1999.

Abstract 

A meta-analysis was carried out to calculate a pooled estimate of relative risk of lung cancer following exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and to determine whether there was any heterogeneity in the pooled estimates according to selected characteristics of the studies. A total of 35 case-control and five cohort studies providing quantitative estimates of the association between lung cancer and exposure to ETS published between January 1981 and March 1999 were identified. Using fixed- and random-effects models, we calculated pooled estimates of relative risk for exposure to ETS from subjects’ parents (during childhood), spouses, and coworkers. As well, we investigated whether the pooled estimates of relative risk varied by study location, degree of control of potential confounding variables, proportion of cases confirmed histologically, proportion of surrogate respondents, nonresponse rates, and year of publication. The relative risk of lung cancer among non smoking women ever exposed to ETS from their husbands’ smoking was 1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.29). The pooled relative risk was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10–1.29) for case-control studies and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.04–1.62) for cohort studies. In various subgroup and meta-regression analyses, we found no statistically significant differences by selected characteristics of the studies. In addition, we found that the risk of lung cancer increased consistently with increasing levels of exposure. The 11 studies reporting relative risks among male non smokers yielded a pooled relative risk of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.13–1.92) for ever exposed to ETS, and the relative risk of lung cancer for ever being exposed to ETS at work was a 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05–1.28). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that exposure to ETS increases the risk of lung cancer. While there may be alternative explanations to the data, it is more likely that the observed association is not an artifact and that ETS causes lung cancer in non smokers.

Keywords:  Lung neoplasms, Environmental tobacco smoke, Passive smoking, Meta-analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0169-5002(99)00093-8

Lung Cancer
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 3-18, January 2000