« Previous
Next »
Lung Cancer
Volume 55, Issue 1
, Pages 75-78
, January 2007
FDG-PET maximum standardised uptake value is associated with variation in survival: Analysis of 498 lung cancer patients
References
- . The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;83:918–924
- Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximum standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3255–3260
- . The maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of a non-small cell lung cancer predict stage, recurrence, and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:151–159
- Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of 125 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3201–3206
- 18F- FDG Uptake as a biologic prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:39–45
- [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1136–1143
- Determination of the prognostic value of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by using positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:865–870
- Standardised FDG uptake: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1533–1541
- . Hybrid analysis for up-to-date long-term survival rates in cancer registries with delayed recording of incident cases. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:2494–2501
- . Lung tumor growth correlates with glucose metabolism measured by fluoride- 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1348–1352
- . Overestimation of the prognostic significance of SUV measurement by positron emission tomography for non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6799–6800
PII: S0169-5002(06)00489-2
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.09.010
© 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Lung Cancer
Volume 55, Issue 1
, Pages 75-78
, January 2007
