Lung Cancer
Volume 55, Issue 1 , Pages 95-99, January 2007

Lessons to learn from EORTC study 08981: A feasibility study of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

  • V. Surmont

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC-Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 10 4391437; fax: +31 10 4391044.
  • ,
  • R.J. van Klaveren

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC-Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • C. Goor

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • F. Schramel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pulmonology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • C. Manegold

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Thoraxklinik Rohrbach, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • C. Legrand

      Affiliations

    • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • P. Van Schil

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • J.P. Van Meerbeeck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pulmonology, University of Ghent, Belgium

Received 10 April 2006; received in revised form 4 September 2006; accepted 23 September 2006.

Summary 

The present EORTC phase II feasibility study in stage IIIB (T4-N3) NSCLC was conducted to investigate whether an induction regimen with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery after restaging by re-mediastinoscopy and/or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emisson tomography (FDG-PET) was feasible in a multicenter setting. Unfortunately, the study closed prematurely because of poor accrual. The combination of more stringent selection criteria, the incorrect prevailing view of Ethical Boards that a tri-modality approach is too toxic, competing studies in the participating centers and the fact that patients with N3 disease could only be enrolled if a re-mediastinoscopy could be performed, underlie the low accrual. Although this study illustrates that the conduct of a tri-modality study across Europe appeared to be difficult at that time, the number of centers with highly qualified and experienced specialists involved in this kind of multi-modality approaches is rapidly increasing. Future initiatives should, therefore, certainly be encouraged. Minimally invasive procedures such as EUS and EBUS should preferably be used for up-front mediastinal staging, mediastinoscopy with or without EUS should preferably be reserved for restaging, and especially right-sided pneumonectomies should be avoided. Though evident, the feasibility to complete this kind of studies within a reasonable time period is still a condition sine qua non.

Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, Combined modality, Re-mediastinoscopy, PET scan

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0169-5002(06)00523-X

doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.09.015

Lung Cancer
Volume 55, Issue 1 , Pages 95-99, January 2007