Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lung cancer

Jeong Eun Leea, Hyae Young Kimb, Kun Young Limb, Soo Hyun Leeb, Geon Kook Leeb, Hee Seok Leeb, Bin HwangbobCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 25 October 2009; received in revised form 9 January 2010; accepted 12 January 2010. published online 08 February 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Purpose

We performed this study to evaluate the role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the pathologic diagnosis of lung cancer including lung masses as well as lymph nodes as targets.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 126 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA to diagnose radiologically suspected lung cancer. The patients had masses or lymph nodes that were highly suspicious for malignancy and accessible by EBUS-TBNA.

Results

EBUS-TBNA was performed on 195 lesions (lymph nodes, n=151; lung masses, n=44). In 61 cases, other diagnostic methods had failed previous to EBUS-TBNA. In 118 patients, no definite endobronchial mucosal tumor invasion was observed. In eight patients with endobronchial tumor invasion, EBUS-TBNA was chosen due to tumor bleeding, necrosis, or difficult location for endobronchial biopsy. EBUS-TBNA confirmed 105 lung cancers, five other malignancies and six specific benign cases, demonstrating a diagnostic yield of 92.1% (116/126). Nine cases were diagnosed by other methods (lung cancer, n=2; other malignancies, n=2; benign cases, n=5). One case that was not confirmed by any diagnostic method was considered false negative. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of lung cancer were 97.2% (105/108) and 97.6% (123/126), respectively.

Conclusions

EBUS-TBNA targeting lymph nodes or masses highly suspicious for malignancy demonstrated high diagnostic value in the diagnosis of lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA is recommended for these cases, especially when other diagnostic methods have failed or are difficult.

a Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University, 33 Munhwa-ro, Gung-gu, Daejeon, 301-721, Republic of Korea

b Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, 410-769, Republic of Korea

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +82 31 920 1618; fax: +82 31 920 2798.

PII: S0169-5002(10)00010-3

doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.01.008